Articles and Publications

For DePuy plaintiffs - and our legal team - Ohio is the place to be

By Independent Staff Writer

Two weeks ago, the U.S. Panel on Multidistrict Litigation conducted a hearing to discuss where the DePuy Hip Implant MDL should be placed. Today, the Panel announced that the litigation will take place in the Northern District of Ohio. 

Complaints about the DePuy ASR hip implants have been reported throughout the United States, which prompted a hearing to consolidate the cases into multidistrict litigation. Counsel for DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. did not object to doing so. The Multidistrict Litigation (MDL) Panel determined that the DePuy cases qualified for consolidation and created DePuy Mulitdistrict Litigation.

There were many different courts in the running for the federal district in which the pretrial proceedings would take place, including Kentucky, Indiana, New Jersey, Ohio, and Florida. Counsel for DePuy and several Plaintiffs' lawyers who represent people harmed by the DePuy devices submitted arguments to the Panel as to which court they felt was most appropriate for these cases. 

As we've explained in previous articles, consolidating a case conserves resources for the attorneys as well as the judiciary, and bringing individual lawsuits for each case can make the costs so prohibitive as to present an obstacle to getting a fair settlement for the plaintiffs. The fact that DePuy Multidistrict Litigation has been formed creates a more efficient way for our legal team to pursue claims for our clients and ensures we are better able to give them the individual attention they need.

To better serve our clients in this case, Moriarty Leyendecker is working in conjunction with The Law Offices of Sullo & Sullo and The Law Offices of Howard L. Nations, the latter of whom was among the lawyers who proposed the Northern District of Ohio as the best venue based on that court's current docket and the speed and efficiency at which they move cases to resolution; the convenience of location for all parties; and the experience of the presiding judge. 

The Honourable David A. Katz is highly experienced with a successful MDL track record. Judge Katz is exceptionally well qualified to handle a matter of this size and complexity. Mr. Nations and his legal team were recently before Judge Katz in litigation regarding Ortho Evra Products Liability, a matter which was successfully resolved in the same Ohio court.

At Moriarty Leyendecker, we are looking forward to working with Judge Katz and his staff on this important matter, and we are confident that this choice of district is in the best interest of our clients.

Recommended Readings:

Hip Implant Risks May Include Premature Failure

How the ASR XL Acetabular System is Constructed

DePuy Asks Hip Implant Patients to Sign Away Their Legal Rights



DISCLAIMER: All cases are based on individual circumstances and the facts pertaining to each case, and the outcome for any particular case depends on a variety of factors. None of the information provided on this website should suggest or guarantee a particular result for any given case. None of the information provided on this website should be construed in any way as legal advice. Further, none of the information provided on this website should suggest or imply the formation of an attorney-client relationship in any capacity whatsoever.
 
Free Consultation
Receive an immediate response to your request.
Choose practice area of your problem:

I understand and agree that submitting this form does not create an attorney-client relationship and that the information I submit is not confidential or privileged and may be shared. I further understand and agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy.


DePuy Hip Recall:
Topics of Interest
Need Bonds?
Get the Bond process started online

Recent Articles and Publications

 
May 13, 2012
The Four Most Common Complications Which Lead to Greater Risk of Unsuccessful Revision
Artificial hip replacements have become increasingly common, yet as people begin to live longer, it is inevitable that these artificial joints will fail, wear out, or cause health complications. Should any of these issues arise a hip revision surgery will become necessary to replace the failing joint.
Full Story
May 12, 2012
A Study of Metal-On-Metal Hip Replacement Implants: Part Two: Cobalt Poisoning Examined
Cobalt poisoning as a result of industrial exposure or medical treatment is fairly well known, however those who were fitted with a metal-on-metal hip implant were not expecting to be subjected to dangerous levels of cobalt. Cobalt poisoning can lead to ringing in the ears, dizziness, deafness, blindness or atrophy of the optic nerve, severe headaches.
Full Story
May 11, 2012
A Study of Metal-On-Metal Hip Replacement Implants: Part One: What is Cobalt and how is it Used?
Unfortunately, a large number of metal-on-metal hip replacement implants have had negative outcomes, from relatively minor to very severe. Tissue damage due to metallosis from the cobalt used in the hip implants can severely compromise any subsequent recommended revision surgery.
Full Story
Sullo & Sullo, LLP ● Product Defects ● DePuy ASR Hip Recall & Metallosis ● About Us
2020 Southwest Fwy, Suite 300 ● Drug Litigation ● DePuy Pinnacle Hip Dangers ● Case Status
Houston, TX 77098 ● Personal Injury ● Transvaginal Mesh ● Cases
Tel: 713-839-9026 ● Criminal Defense ● Actos & Bladder Cancer ● FAQs
Fax: 713-523-6634 ● Traffic Tickets ● Depakote & Topamax Birth Defects ● Testimonials
  ● Family Law ● Pradaxa & Internal Bleeds ● Contact Us

We noticed you did not enter a telephone number. Please understand that our purpose in communicating with you verbally is to provide you with the most appropriate advice that is specifically tailored to your individual circumstances. We will try to contact you, but will absolutely NOT call you incessantly. Do you still want to leave out your contact telephone number? 
 
  

To submit your request you must select the check box to confirm with our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy.