! Stryker Hip Settlement Alert !


Stryker Hip Implant Recipients TAKE NOTE - Stryker Corporation has reached a 1.4 billion dollar settlement in its metal hip implant MDL. Learn all about the Stryker Master Settlement Agreement here.


Connecticut Statute of Limitations for Stryker Hip Lawsuits

By Andrew Sullo

Andrew Sullo on Google+

How the Connecticut Stryker Hip Statute of Limitations May Affect You: Perhaps you are aware of the Stryker hip recall which occurred in July, 2012—that is, if you have one of the devices implanted in your body. The Rejuvenate and ABGII were both included in the recall which stated the devices had a higher-than-normal failure rate and were prone to fretting and corrosion at the neck junction, leading to the release of excess amounts of cobalt and chromium ions into the body. The Connecticut Stryker hip statute of limitations is important for those who have suffered injury from the Stryker hip recall; the statutes are different in each state and define a sometimes narrow window of opportunity in which to file a Stryker hip lawsuit. The state of Connecticut allows three years from the time the injury is discovered—or should have been discovered—and additionally has a ten-year statute of repose, which begins at the time the manufacturer or seller “parts” with the device.


How a Connecticut Stryker Hip Lawyer Can Help

The statutes of repose tends to be broader than the statutes of limitations and are designed to bar actions after a specified period of time has run, but are not dependent upon specific injury—as the statute of limitations are. In short, the statute of limitations is triggered by an injury, while the statute of repose is generally triggered by the completion of an act—in this case at the time the Stryker hip device leaves the manufacturer or seller. Because the Connecticut Stryker hip statute of limitations can be difficult to understand, it is important that you speak to an experienced Connecticut Stryker hip lawyer in order to get the very best advice possible. Your Connecticut Stryker hip lawyer is well-versed in everything related to the Stryker hip recall and will use that knowledge to determine when your statute of limitations will end and how to best proceed with a Connecticut Stryker hip lawsuit.


Obtaining Compensation Following the Stryker Hip Recall

Whether you have suffered grave injury from the Stryker hip recall or less serious medical issues, you deserve compensation. After all, at the time the Rejuvenate and ABGII were released, Stryker claimed the innovative design of the devices was not only long-lasting, but safe as well. Following FDA approval in 2008 and 2009, a major marketing push began in 2010. Within a few short months, the FDA was receiving adverse event reports regarding the two Stryker implants. Surgeons claimed that when removed, the implants were covered in what appeared to be “black rust,” and that some patients exhibited a milky substance in the hip tissues. By the end of 2011, the FDA had received hundreds of adverse reports regarding problems with the Rejuvenate and ABGII, yet continued to market the devices until the recall. Many believe Stryker was well aware of the problems associated with the two devices, but chose to ignore those issues in favor of financial gain.


Metallosis and Metal Poisoning Resulting From a Recalled Stryker Hip Implant

If your Stryker hip implant has caused you to suffer metallosis symptoms such as chronic pain, severe inflammation, deterioration of tissue and bone, total hip failure or the necessity of revision surgery, you may benefit from a Connecticut Stryker hip lawsuit. Excess cobalt and chromium ions which make their way to the bloodstream can cause: neurological, cardiovascular, renal, thyroid and gastrointestinal disorders, vision and hearing loss, vertigo, memory loss, anxiety, depression and irritability, reproductive disorders and the formation of pseudo-tumors. Don’t let your Connecticut Stryker hip statute of limitations pass you by; speak to an experienced Connecticut Stryker hip lawyer who can explain your options and work hard for your future.

A Notice to Connecticut Residents with Stryker Hip Implants

Residents of the following locales in Connecticut who were implanted with a Stryker Rejuvenate or Stryker ABGII hip implant are encouraged to contact a Connecticut Stryker Hip Lawyer:

Bridgeport, Connecticut

New Haven, Connecticut

Hartford, Connecticut

Stamford, Connecticut

Waterbury, Connecticut

Norwalk, Connecticut

Danbury, Connecticut

New Britain, Connecticut



Statutes of Limitations limit the amount of time that an individual has to file a lawsuit, and not only vary from state to state, but also vary by cause of action. The information provided above and in the state-specific pages in this section is meant as a general guide, and is for informational purposes only. Each client’s case is unique, and the specific circumstances of any individual case can have significant bearing on the applicable statute of limitations. Any person who believes they may have a viable cause of action is strongly encouraged to consult with an attorney about the statute of limitations for his or her case.

Attorney Andrew Sullo is licensed to practice law in Texas, and can prosecute cases that are part of a federal multi-district litigation. Andrew Sullo does not practice law in any other state, and is not certified by the Boards of Legal Specialization in any state. Not all states have board certifications. This information is not intended to solicit clients for matters outside of the State of Texas. Our firm is not accepting cases in any state where it would be impermissible for it to do so. Sullo & Sullo, LLP maintains its principal office in Houston, Texas.

Free Consultation
Receive an immediate response to your request.
Choose the Practice Area of Your Problem:

I understand and agree that submitting this form does not create an attorney-client relationship and that the information I submit is not confidential or privileged and may be shared. I further understand and agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy

Enter the code shown above in the box below

Recent Articles & Publications

March 28, 2017
March 28, 2017 - Thousands of consumers were affected by the Stryker recall in July 2012. The recall covered both the Rejuvenate and the ABGII.  At the time of the Stryker...

March 17, 2017
March 16, 2017 - When Stryker first introduced the Stryker Rejuvenate in early 2010, the company claimed the device would last much longer than other metal hip implants...Soon...

January 5, 2017
January 04, 2017 - If you heard about the Stryker hip recall which occurred in July 2012, you may have been unsure of whether your hip implant was one of the recalled devices....

Get Interactive

Sullo & Sullo-Facebook Sullo & Sullo-Linkedin Sullo & Sullo-Twitter Sullo & Sullo-You Tube