! Stryker Hip Settlement Alert !


Stryker Hip Implant Recipients TAKE NOTE - Stryker Corporation has reached a 1.4 billion dollar settlement in its metal hip implant MDL. Learn all about the Stryker Master Settlement Agreement here.


Maryland Statute of Limitations for Stryker Hip Lawsuits

By Andrew Sullo

Andrew Sullo on Google+

Have You Been Affected by the Stryker Hip Recall? Stryker, a Michigan-based corporation, issued a Stryker hip recall in July, 2012, on the heels of an urgent field safety notification which went out to hospitals and surgeons just three months’ prior. Both the safety notification and the recall notice stated the Rejuvenate and ABGII had a higher-than-normal rate of failure due to excess fretting and corrosion. This fretting and corrosion could then lead to the release of cobalt and chromium ions into surrounding tissue and into the bloodstream. This came as a surprise to many as Stryker aggressively marketed the new hip implants as much safer than a “true” metal-on-metal hip implant due to the use of a ceramic ball rather than a metal ball. Unfortunately, the neck/stem junction was later found to create ion debris during periods of patient activity.


The small metal trunnions located on either end of the neck component were also found to release metal ions when body fluids became trapped underneath. Over 20,000 patients received a Rejuvenate or ABGII between February 2010, when both models were released (after FDA approval in 2008 and 2009) and the time the recall was issued. Within a few short months of the release of the two Stryker hip implants, adverse reports were being sent to the FDA. Some surgeons who were forced to remove one of these implants from a patient noted the presence of a substance which looked like “black rust.” Others noted a white, milky substance in the hip tissues. By early 2012, over 300 adverse reports had come into the FDA, yet Stryker continued to sell the devices until the recall. Perhaps you, like many others have reason to file a Maryland Stryker hip lawsuit. If so, it is very important that you speak to a Maryland Stryker hip lawyer as soon as possible to avoid exceeding your state’s statute of limitations.


Health Problems Associated With the Stryker Hip Recall

The metal ions in the hip tissues were found to cause destruction and death of bone and tissue, total hip failure, acute inflammation, chronic pain in the groin, leg and thigh and the necessity of revision surgery. Cobalt and chromium ions in the bloodstream can lead to a variety of serious health issues such as:


·         Gastrointestinal, renal, thyroid, cardiovascular and neurological disorders

·         Loss of hearing or vision

·         Anxiety, depression, irritability

·         Vertigo and memory loss

·         Reproductive disorders

·         DNA changes

·         The development of pseudo-tumors


How the Maryland Stryker Hip Statute of Limitations May Affect You

All states have a specific statute of limitations which allows consumers a specific length of time in which to file a lawsuit against the manufacturer of a defective product. In the state of Maryland, action must be brought within three years of the date the injury occurred. In the case of the Stryker hip recall, determining the exact date can be complex. Perhaps you realized you were sick, but did not realize your symptoms were related to your defective Stryker hip device. Or perhaps you have not yet suffered any adverse health symptoms, but are wondering how to protect your rights in the event you do develop symptoms associated with the Stryker hip recall. The best way to get trustworthy information regarding your right to file a Maryland Stryker hip lawsuit and to ensure the statutes are not exceeded is to speak to a knowledgeable Maryland Stryker hip lawyer. You may have medical expenses related to your defective Stryker hip implant, therefore the Maryland Stryker hip statute of limitations is extremely important. Don’t miss the window of opportunity for filing a Maryland Stryker hip lawsuit—call a Stryker attorney today to get the information you need for your future.



A Notice to Maryland Residents with Stryker Hip Implants

Residents of the following locales in Maryland who were implanted with a Stryker Rejuvenate or Stryker ABGII hip implant are encouraged to contact a Maryland Stryker Hip Lawyer:

Baltimore, Maryland

Columbia, Maryland

Germantown, Maryland

Silver Spring, Maryland

Waldorf, Maryland

Glen Burie, Maryland

Ellicott City, Maryland

Frederick, Maryland



Statutes of Limitations limit the amount of time that an individual has to file a lawsuit, and not only vary from state to state, but also vary by cause of action. The information provided above and in the state-specific pages in this section is meant as a general guide, and is for informational purposes only. Each client’s case is unique, and the specific circumstances of any individual case can have significant bearing on the applicable statute of limitations. Any person who believes they may have a viable cause of action is strongly encouraged to consult with an attorney about the statute of limitations for his or her case.

Attorney Andrew Sullo is licensed to practice law in Texas, and can prosecute cases that are part of a federal multi-district litigation. Andrew Sullo does not practice law in any other state, and is not certified by the Boards of Legal Specialization in any state. Not all states have board certifications. This information is not intended to solicit clients for matters outside of the State of Texas. Our firm is not accepting cases in any state where it would be impermissible for it to do so. Sullo & Sullo, LLP maintains its principal office in Houston, Texas.

Free Consultation
Receive an immediate response to your request.
Choose the Practice Area of Your Problem:

I understand and agree that submitting this form does not create an attorney-client relationship and that the information I submit is not confidential or privileged and may be shared. I further understand and agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy

Enter the code shown above in the box below

Recent Articles & Publications

March 28, 2017
March 28, 2017 - Thousands of consumers were affected by the Stryker recall in July 2012. The recall covered both the Rejuvenate and the ABGII.  At the time of the Stryker...

March 17, 2017
March 16, 2017 - When Stryker first introduced the Stryker Rejuvenate in early 2010, the company claimed the device would last much longer than other metal hip implants...Soon...

January 5, 2017
January 04, 2017 - If you heard about the Stryker hip recall which occurred in July 2012, you may have been unsure of whether your hip implant was one of the recalled devices....

Get Interactive

Sullo & Sullo-Facebook Sullo & Sullo-Linkedin Sullo & Sullo-Twitter Sullo & Sullo-You Tube