Transvaginal Mesh: A Brief Overview

As far back as the 1950’s abdominal hernia repairs with mesh were performed, and in the 1970’s American gynecologists saw the potential for using mesh in pelvic organ prolapse surgeries. Once a medical device is approved by the FDA, it can be used in any way surgeons see fit, therefore surgeons decided to simply cut the surgical mesh into different shapes, using it to treat pelvic organ prolapse. Pelvic organ prolapse can occur in women whose pelvic or vaginal walls have become overly stretched following childbirth, menopause or a hysterectomy. When these ligaments are stretched past their limits, the uterus would press on the bladder, causing embarrassing and inconvenient incontinence issues.

Please read on to learn more about the Transvaginal Mesh FDA Warning and how to protect your rights:



Transvaginal Mesh Overview: History of Surgical Mesh:

As far back as the 1950’s abdominal hernia repairs with mesh were performed, and in the 1970’s American gynecologists saw the potential for using mesh in pelvic organ prolapse surgeries. Once a medical device is approved by the FDA... More...

Transvaginal Mesh FDA Warning:

The mesh implant has been used since the 1950’s, primarily in hernia surgeries. While some of the recipients of the mesh implant reported a hernia mesh infection following their surgery, the mesh implant was largely considered safe for use. The FDA approved the mesh implant specifically... More...

The Dangers of Transvaginal Mesh:

The transvaginal mesh implant had its roots in hernia repair surgery as far back as the 1950’s. Many studies found the use of mesh in hernia surgeries as opposed to non-mesh open repair to be associated with a significantly reduced rate of recurrence. Because of the successes using mesh in hernia... More...

Transvaginal Mesh Lawsuits:

A recent surge in vaginal mesh lawsuits has sparked controversy over whether the transvaginal mesh typically used in surgeries to correct pelvic organ prolapse or stress incontinence has caused injuries—from minor to severe—among women who were implanted with the device. Prior to the rash... More...

How We Can Help:

As a qualified products liability law firm, Sullo & Sullo is able to help you in several very important ways... More...


Free Consultation  Call Now

Get Interactive

 
 
Free Consultation
Receive an immediate response to your request.
Choose practice area of your problem:

I understand and agree that submitting this form does not create an attorney-client relationship and that the information I submit is not confidential or privileged and may be shared. I further understand and agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy

CAPTCHA image
Enter the code shown above in the box below

Recent Articles & Publications

March 22, 2013
Transvaginal Mesh Evaluation: An Assessment of Synthetic Mesh Materials Used in Pelvic Organ Prolapse (POP) Repair

A review article published last June in the Current Urology Reports Journal assesses the outcomes and complications of using synthetic mesh materials in pelvic organ prolapse (POP) repair procedures, as well as the public health notification released by the FDA about these procedures. The present article summarizes the information presented in the review.


March 21, 2013
Transvaginal Mesh Studies: Is Synthetic Mesh or Native Tissue better for Posterior Vaginal Wall Prolapse Repair?

In June 2012, the Current Urology Reports Journal published a review article which assesses the risks and benefits of using synthetic mesh for Pelvic Organ Prolapse (POP) repair, giving particular emphasis to repairs of the posterior vaginal wall compartment. The present article summarizes the main points presented in the Current Urology Reports review.


March 20, 2013
Transvaginal Mesh Reports: An Assessment of Central and Apical Compartment Repair using Synthetic Mesh

The Current Urology Reports Journal published in June 2012 a review article that describes the different methods used to repair defects in the central and apical compartments utilizing synthetic meshes. The article also presents FDA’s (U.S. Food and Drug Administration) concerns and recommendations with respect to the use of meshes in these procedures. The present article summarizes the information published in the review.